<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>XOUNZ</title>
		<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php</link>
		<description><![CDATA[XOUNZ -- ]]></description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2012, Tom and Ang</copyright>
		<managingEditor>Tom and Ang</managingEditor>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<generator>SPHPBLOG 0.4.8</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0019 -- Sarah Palin - The Death Knell of SNL</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry081022-214546</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/SarahPalinHandsInDaAyer.jpg" width="378" height="214" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Sarah Palin puttin&#039; her hayands in da ayair.</b><br /><br />Sarah Palin appeared on SNL last night.  The skits were funny without her really doing anything to help them along.  She rode the wave of Amy Poehler and Tina Fey (genius - despite the fact that Alec Baldwin couldn&#039;t even read lines from a teleprompter).  However, I don&#039;t think she did anything to help herself.  She&#039;s being attacked for not being capable of leading the country.  She came off as hip and having a good sense of humour about herself, but she did nothing to advance the idea that she is capable.  <br /><br /><br /><img src="images/SarahPalinAndSethMeyers.jpg" width="379" height="220" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Sarah Palin delivering some lines with Seth Meyers.</b><br /><br />I think if she went on a proper news or investigative show like 20/20 or even something like The View and stood her ground, she would have done much more to help herself.  The show openly mocked her yet again and she stood by and smile and waved.  The SNL appearance marks the end of the McCain/Palin campaign in my opinion.  <br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<category>News</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry081022-214546</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:45:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=10&amp;entry=entry081022-214546</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0018 -- Twinkle Twinkle Toronto Star</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry080916-223911</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/TorontoStar.jpg" width="182" height="55" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Twinkle Twinkle Toronto Star; How I wonder <i>when</i> you are</b><br /><br />Lately we&#039;ve been intermittently receiving the Toronto Star.  What&#039;s particularly odd about this random delivery is that we never actually subscribed to the ruddy thing.  <br /><br /><b>Some Kind of Mistake?</b><br />So at first, I thought, well, this must be a mistake.  I&#039;m getting my neighbour&#039;s paper.  As it turns out, though, it&#039;s been happening for two weeks.  I live on a small court with neighbours who are reasonably comfortable with approaching each other.  I think if I were receiving their paper, they would have noticed and either called the Toronto Star to have it corrected, or told me that I was getting their paper and to give it back.<br /><br /><b>Promotional Delivery?</b><br />So, then I thought, &quot;Well, maybe it&#039;s one of those promotional things - they give you the newspaper for a couple of weeks and then they try to hook you on a subscription.&quot;  That might be, but if that is the case, they&#039;re not doing a particularly good job of selling me on their subscription service.  The paper, for some reason, doesn&#039;t come every single day - or rather it comes, but not on the day it was meant to be delivered.  Sometimes they skip a day and then, after two or three days, they all appear at once on my veranda.  I get three papers in one shot!  Now how is <b>THAT</b> going to win me over?  What a brilliant pitch:<br /><br />&quot;Join the Toronto Star where you&#039;ll get the newspaper intermittently throughout the week.  Why inconvenience yourself with collecting the paper from your porch every single day?  With the Toronto Star, just come outside every three days and we&#039;ll scatter the newspapers from the last three days across your door step!&quot;<br /><br />Genius.  <br /><br /><b>Security Feature</b><br />Maybe it&#039;s a security feature that the Toronto Star subscription service offers.  They don&#039;t want papers to come every day because somebody may be casing your house for a robbery.  Instead, they deliver no paper for three days, and then you get a big stack all at once.  The criminals are baffled.  They think, &quot;What the hell is going on with that house?  I can&#039;t rob that place!  It&#039;s a scheduling <i>nightmare</i>!&quot;  <br /><br />Again.  Genius.<br /><br /><b>What do you think?</b><br />Give me your thoughts on what this random paper delivery may be all about.  If your explanation is good enough, maybe I&#039;ll actually subscribe to the Toronto Star.  Probably not, but maybe.  ]]></description>
			<category>News</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry080916-223911</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:39:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=09&amp;entry=entry080916-223911</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0017 -- Unidentified Object Discovered in Space - A Transient of a New Class</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry080915-212809</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/NothingStrangeObject.jpg" width="448" height="599" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br />A photo taken from the Hubble Telescope of a strange object that appeared, brightened for 21 days, dimmed for the same time frame and then disappeared.   The photo was taken from a <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0809/0809.1648v1.pdf" target="_blank" >paper accepted to the &quot;Astrophysical Journal&quot;</a><br /><br /><b>A Transient of a New Class</b><br />OK.  This is unbelievably cool.  An unidentified object was discovered with the Hubble Telescope.  It matches nothing they&#039;ve ever seen before.  It came and went over a period of 42 days.  The research paper doesn&#039;t speculate on what it is, but they &quot;...suggest that the transient may be one of a new class.&quot;<br /><br />I aspire to one day be a Transient of Another Class.<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<category>News</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry080915-212809</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:28:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=09&amp;entry=entry080915-212809</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0016 -- Canadian Federal Election on October 14, 2008</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry080908-225052</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/headUpArse.jpg" width="407" height="460" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>I must say, when it comes to calling an election, the Canadian political system has its head up its arse.</b><br /><br />The rules for calling a Federal Election in Canada are a joke.   The ruling party can call an election pretty much any time the urge strikes them.  They dissolve parliament and we&#039;re off to the polls.  Case in point, Stephen Harper had a little chat with the Governor General over the weekend and we&#039;re now having an election in just over a month.  In what world does that make sense?  <br /><br />First of all, in what other job do you get to determine <i>when</i> you have your own job evaluation?  Just imagine how that might work in your own job.  &quot;Welcome aboard.  Here&#039;s how our job evaluation system works: You have 5 years to pick a time for your own job review and you can pick any time you&#039;d like - just let us know when you&#039;re ready.&quot;  And your response might be: &quot;Right, I know I&#039;ve only just started, but I think most folks here seem to like me and I think they&#039;d like me better than anyone else who&#039;s just joined, so, how about we do this right now?&quot;  Perfect.<br /><br />Second, in what other country would you give the competitive parties and the country 5 WEEKS TO PREPARE FOR A NATIONAL ELECTION!?  Seriously!  And you know that the Tories were ready to go.  I live in Whitby, home of the esteemed Finance Minister for the government of Canada.  They dissolved parliament on Sunday and I saw election signs this morning on the way to work.  Hmmmm ... do you think maybe they had this worked out? Ridiculous.<br /><br />I think a regularly scheduled election with a longer lead time than 5 weeks should be a standing law.  Of course, no elected party will ever change the law because, once they&#039;re in, they get to call the election time, so why would you want to change that?  Absurd.<br /><br />What&#039;s worse is that the short turn around time means that the parties typically stay with the leaders they have.  So, despite the fact that Stephan Dion is looking feeble as a leader and contender against Harper, they&#039;re going to go ahead and run with him.  What choice do they have?  Elecction is in 5 weeks.  It&#039;s a travesty!<br /><br /><b>Vote for Pedro!</b><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<category>News</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry080908-225052</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:50:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=09&amp;entry=entry080908-225052</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0015 -- Reporting and Analysis from the Most Mediocre Hiker on the Internet</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry080903-192405</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/MeOnTheHill.jpg" width="484" height="325" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />I think it&#039;s great that CNN claims it has the Best Political Team on television.  They always say &quot;Reporting and Analysis from the Best Political Team on Television.&quot;  Cool.  They haven&#039;t really won an award or been assigned that title by any independent body, but they reckon it&#039;s true.  <br /><br />I reckon I am the Most Mediocre Hiker on the Internet.  So I&#039;m laying claim to that title.  While I&#039;m at it, here are a few more claims from me:<br /><br />The Best Nail Clipper in the Greater Toronto Area<br />The Worst Lip Syncher on the Don Valley Parkway<br />The Best Parallel Parker in Northern Whitby<br /><br />Jeffrey Toobin is a Senior Analyst on CNN.  He&#039;s a former prosecutor and a former New York Columnist.  I&#039;m not sure how that makes him a member of the Best Political Team on Television, but apparently it does.  So I figure, as the Most Mediocre Hiker on the Internet, I am comparably qualified, so I&#039;m going to give my two cents on Sarah Palin&#039;s Vice Presidential Speech today.  <br /><br /><br />I agree with Peggy Noonan.  A prominant Republican woman who, when she thought the microphone was off, called the Palin pick &quot;BS&quot;, &quot;gimicky&quot; and said the McCain campaign &quot;is over&quot;.  See the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrG8w4bb3kg" target="_blank" >video</a> for yourself<br /><br /><br /><br />We&#039;ll see how she does tonight, but from where I&#039;m sitting she&#039;s going to have to pull a miracle out tonight.]]></description>
			<category>News</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry080903-192405</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:24:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=08&amp;m=09&amp;entry=entry080903-192405</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0014 -- Canabilism, Gary Bettman and the Battle of Waterloo: The Real Reasons Hamilton will Never Get an NHL Team</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry070707-145823</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/hamPreds2.jpg" width="484" height="69" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Setting the Tone</b><br />To be clear, I love Hamilton and I think Hamilton deserves an NHL team.  I also think Gary Bettman is delusional in his attempts to make hockey a viable sport in any state south of the Mason/Dixon line (with the exception of LA and Tampa Bay where ample Canadians live during winter).  I am also a member of the Facebook Group called &quot;Canada vs. Gary Bettman&quot;.<br /><br />Now, having framed this post in an appropriate way, I want to explain why I think it is nearly impossible for Hamilton to get an NHL team owing largely to: 1) canabilism and 2) Gary Bettman&#039;s business plan.  I think that if someone replaces Gary Bettman and takes a different approach, Hamilton <i>could get a team</i>, but it&#039;s not likely.  It&#039;s more likely that pending the outcome of the &quot;Battle of Waterloo&quot;, that another city would win out.<br /><br /><b>1) Canibalizing an NHL Franchise</b><br />As anybody who&#039;s created or managed a product knows that if you have a successful product in a particular market, you nurture it and, as it reaches the end of it&#039;s life cycle, you begin to plant the seeds of a replacement product.  If you want to grow more revenue, you create a NEW product in a NEW market.  What you don&#039;t do is create a new product in the same market that&#039;s going to eat into the market share of the existing successful product.  That will generate no new revenue and will only cost more money. So what does that have to do with the NHL?  Well, it&#039;s the same deal with NHL teams.   <br /><br />Toronto is an established, highly lucrative team that serves a great deal of Ontario.  If you plant a new team in Hamilton, how much new revenue will it generate?  It will mostly just take fans (and revenue) from Toronto and Buffalo.  It will generate <i>some</i> new money from Ticket Sales as there will now be an additional 18k seats available for sale, but in every other way (TV share, advertising, merchandise, etc.), it will only take from existing products (i.e., Toronto and Buffalo).  So does it make sense for the NHL to allow another team in an area that has an existing team if it isn&#039;t going to generate all that much more revenue?  Probably not.  <br /><br /><b>2) Gary Bettman&#039;s Delusions</b><br />Gary Bettman gets point #1) and that&#039;s why he wants new teams in new markets.  The problem is more his choice of which markets.  He thinks he can expand hockey&#039;s appeal, viability and credibility as a sport by getting teams in southern states.  He&#039;s delusional.  Hockey will never appeal to people in those states and, even where it does draw some folks to the games, it will never earn a decent ticket price, nor a decent share of TV ratings in those markets.  Why?   Because it will always come in fourth place to the sports that overlap in season: Baseball, Football, and Basketball.  People will always pick hockey last in those markets when given a choice.<br /><br />Do you really think that Kansas City Chiefs fans will give up end of season and possibly playoff tickets or TV games to attend or watch a hockey game?  Do you really think they&#039;d give up season openers or even training camp games for the Kansas City Royals in exchange for hockey game - even a <i>playoff</i> hockey game?  And they&#039;d probably rather watch ANY city&#039;s basketball team play basketball than watch a Kansas City hockey game on TV! Gary&#039;s dream of successful southern team is ridiculous.  It will NEVER happen except in cities like LA (lots of Canadians living there) and Tampa Bay (lots of snowbirds there).<br /><br />Gary would be better off putting more teams in Northern cities that could/would support them.  Even though some of those markets are smaller, they&#039;d be willing to pay <i>more</i> to see games and they&#039;d have a higher TV ratings share.  So ... even if Gary wants to keep it American, he should be planting teams in northern states.  He should also consider Canadian Cities while he&#039;s at it.<br /><br /><b>3) Replacement Product -- The Battle of Waterloo</b><br />Back to Hamilton for a minute.  The only chance Hamilton would have of getting a new team would be if people finally recognized that Buffalo, even despite it&#039;s recent winningness, is a dying franchise that needs to be replaced.  They could certainly put that team in Hamilton.  Hamilton itself has a dying economy (we&#039;ve lost 290k jobs in manufacturing in the last three years in Ontario and Hamilton is a manufacturing kinda town), but it sits in a prime location.  It would draw Buffalo fans, St. Catherines fans, Hamilton Fans, Waterloo fans, Guelph fans, Mississauga fans, Burlinggton fans, Oakfille fans, and even Toronto fans. Of course, this doesn&#039;t cure the canabilism of the Toronto product, but it does provide a replacement product for Buffalo.<br /><br />Another alternative would be a Waterloo team.  Something Jim Balsillie might well be considering.  He purchased a parcel of land in Cambridge that is suspiciously large enough to host an arena.  It also would be outside Toronto&#039;s competitive zone and would draw new fans from South Western Ontario that couldn&#039;t make the drive to the TO area ... places like London, Sarnia, etc.  It would also draw from the same places a Hamilton team would ... Guelph, Burlington etc.  So that might be an option.  <br /><br />Unfortunately, ol&#039; Jim Balsillie has really cheesed off Gary Bettman, who doesn&#039;t want anymore Canadian teams anyway, and he hasn&#039;t won any friends among the NHL owners.   So, if he were interested in putting a team there, he&#039;s sort of created the &quot;Battle of Waterloo&quot;.  It&#039;s not one that will be easily resolved in the near future.<br /><br />Thus, Ontario hockey fans, it is unlikely that we&#039;ll get a team in Ontario anytime soon and even more unlikely that it will be in Hamilton.  But we can all still dream, can&#039;t we!!<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
			<category>Sports</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry070707-145823</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:58:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=07&amp;m=07&amp;entry=entry070707-145823</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0013 -- The Return of Myke and Dara</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry070704-195941</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/mykeAngAndDara.jpg" width="400" height="300" border="0" alt="" /><br /><b>Myke, Ang and Dara - Yonge and Eglinton Subway Station</b><br /><br />Our friends Myke and Dara paid us a visit this week and they successfully goaded me into rekindling this blog.  It&#039;s been over a year now since we last saw them in Hawaii for their wedding.  It&#039;s also been roughly 8 months since I posted to our blog, &#039;xounz&#039;.  Both the visit and this post were well overdue.<br /><br /><img src="images/tomDaraAndMyke.jpg" width="400" height="300" border="0" alt="" /><br /><b>Tom, Dara and Myke - downtown Toronto</b><br /><br />We had a great time catching up on old times.  We went to a few pubs, a few dinners, a few parks and caught up over a few glasses of wine. <br /><br /><img src="images/angAndMyke.jpg" width="400" height="300" border="0" alt="" /><br /><b>Ang and Myke at a local pub</b><br /><br />Ang and I, of course, relentlessly chastised Myke and Dara to return to Canada.  It was cruel, but we miss them so much we couldn&#039;t help ourselves.  Can you blame us?  Just look at them in the picture below.  They are content and in their element in Toronto.  Come back to us, guys!!<br /><br /><img src="images/mykeAndDara.jpg" width="400" height="300" border="0" alt="" /><br /><b>Myke and Dara strolling up Yonge Street north of Lawerence.</b><br /><br /><br />In the end, we were unsuccessful in our attempts to woo them back to Canada and we dropped them off at the airport earlier today.  We wish them well back in California, but we hope to see them back in Canada again soon!<br />]]></description>
			<category></category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry070704-195941</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 23:59:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=07&amp;m=07&amp;entry=entry070704-195941</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0012 -- Generalized Anxiety</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry061117-235835</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b>Posted by: Tom</b><br /><br /><img src="images/gens_puck.jpg" width="378" height="357" border="0" alt="" /><br /><a href="http://www.oshawagenerals.com/" target="_blank" >Oshawa Generals</a><br /><br />I went with the guys from work to see the Oshawa Generals game tonight.  It was exciting for two reasons: first, it was cool to see such a revered hockey team - the very team that started such greats as Bobby Orr!  Second, it was the first live hockey game for one of the guys from work.  He&#039;s from India and while he&#039;s a huge sports fan and follows the Leafs, he had never been to see a live hockey game.  <br /><br />The Generals played the Barrie Colts.  Over all, I think the game was pretty entertaining despite the fact that the Generals lost to Barrie, 7-5.  Once they warmed up, there was lots of great action, a few scraps and tons of scoring.  We had kick ass seats at ice level in the new General Motors Centre and got to see all the action up close.<br /><br />On the downside, the Generals were grossly out-shot and the shots that they did manage to take were, for the most part, quite feeble.  Much worse than the shot ratio, though, was the referee.  What an abomination!  Quite apart from what seemed like a bias against the Generals, his calls were terrible in their own right.  He called way too many penalties, he called things that he should have let go and he missed blatant, dangerous infractions that should have been called.   It was, without a doubt, one of the worst called games that I have ever seen.<br /><br />Again, despite the anxiety induced by the lack of shots from the Generals and the crap ref, the game was very fun!  The gang seemed to have a great time and I thought the game was fantastic - I forgot how fun it is to go to a live game.  Good show, Generals!<br />]]></description>
			<category>Sports</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry061117-235835</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:58:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=06&amp;m=11&amp;entry=entry061117-235835</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0011 -- Christine Lomas Photography</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry061117-152953</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b>Posted by: Tom</b><br /><br /><a href="http://www.christinelomasphotography.com" target="_blank" ><img src="images/Holland_05_LS.jpg" width="336" height="448" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.christinelomasphotography.com" target="_blank" >Christine Lomas Photography</a><br /><br /><br />On November 1st, a friend and colleague of mine, Christine Lomas launched her new Web site and it coincided with her photography show in Picton.  She fared very well at the show and was featured in an article in the local newspaper.  Do check out her <a href="http://www.christinelomasphotography.com" target="_blank" >site</a> and photos.<br /><br />Congratulations, Christine!!<br />]]></description>
			<category>Art</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry061117-152953</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=06&amp;m=11&amp;entry=entry061117-152953</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Post 0010 -- Huzzah!</title>
			<link>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry060923-104717</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b>Posted by: Tom</b><br /><br /><img src="images/head4_w82.jpg" width="90" height="88" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><br /><br /><b>Your writing covers issues such as globalisation, media saturation, fast food, human trafficking, food genetics and drug culture. Would you describe yourself as a political writer?</b><br /><i><br />Yesterday I was speaking with a friend of mine who’s a psychiatrist. I admitted to him that after a long night of the soul I realized I had no idea what my political convictions are. None. Liberal? Conservative? Anarchist? Zip. I know how I was raised and how my parents tried to indoctrinate me, and I’m long over that. And I know how I feel on separate issues. But to fit me into a slot from a doctrinaire standpoint? Blank. My friend thought my horror at my lack of direction was really funny. He said most people don’t have a clue but pretend that they do. He said the world’s a mess. He said that I’m the generic swing voter and both a pollster and politico’s dream. And I’m unsure of how that makes me feel. I like to think I believe in what’s right, yet a sense of irony allows me to contain a lot of opposites in my head at one time. Net result? A need to play out my internal conflicts about big issues on paper. So—and this is a very unexpected response—I’d have to answer your question with a yes. And it would be so much easier just to be able to say no. </i><br /><br /><b> -- Douglas Coupland in a Q&amp;A Session with bloomsbury.com</b><br /><br /><br />A question and <a href="http://www.coupland.com" target="_blank" >Douglas Coupland</a>&#039;s response in <a href="http://bloomsbury.com/" target="_blank" >bloomsbury.com</a> <a href="http://www.bloomsbury.com/Authors/microsite.asp?id=1080§ion=1&amp;aid=1581" target="_blank" >Q&amp;A session</a> around his book <i>jPod</i>.  I can only say &quot;Huzzah!&quot; and &quot;Amen.&quot;]]></description>
			<category>Books</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tomandang.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry060923-104717</guid>
			<author>Tom and Ang</author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.tomandang.com/blog/comments.php?y=06&amp;m=09&amp;entry=entry060923-104717</comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

